three utility
attention director, enabler, and evaluator
elaborate later in depth
A blatant rip-off of amazon's philosophy
They make sure that team sizes are usually no bigger than the number of people who can be fed by 2 pizzas i.e 2-3 people per executing team for tighter execution quality.
I am of the same opinion.... keep the independent unit of execution as small as possible...for creating certainty.
how these systems work
computers/AI/ML Systems - some understanding
Business - working on it
Financial system of the world - next
Land system of the world - last (the reward of 1,2,3 combined)
Helping 10 companies reach 1 billion dollar revenue.... is a tough experience...but I can tell that each time you get 1 company set for creating that outcome.... the activity required to stay on the curve to a billion-dollar revenue decreases exponentially over time.....
In simpler terms - getting to the top of the mountain is hard, but staying there is easy in our business.
Hence I am confident, that we could make money in the long run with our strategy and create a long-lasting happy company to work with for the team members.
All we need to track and control are the variables are pointing in the right direction while achieving our numbers on a quarterly basis.
The only way I am going to give you Bigger customer, when I see you are creating certainty in the work given everytime , forever….so that I trust you work and build leverage for my time……
bigger customer , bigger company payout , bigger team member compensation
discuss leverage with team…… you do your work and then some more so that you will create certainty and make money for themselves…..
I want people who are proactive..… in the long run wahi rahenge jo pro-active hoke certainty create karenge
If I have these two, we can become a billion dollar company in next 5 years, i.e before 31st, Dec, 2027
Make it happen !!1